tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-654754338632526091.post4964943553437915746..comments2024-03-27T00:32:29.877-07:00Comments on Photos and Stuff: The Argument Againstamolitorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15743439184763617516noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-654754338632526091.post-35099791764168475422013-05-16T09:41:39.217-07:002013-05-16T09:41:39.217-07:00Ok, that's enough of that. I don't mind al...Ok, that's enough of that. I don't mind alternate opinions, but if you're just going to insult me you're out of here.<br />amolitorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15743439184763617516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-654754338632526091.post-70275099990128209562013-05-16T09:38:19.623-07:002013-05-16T09:38:19.623-07:00You certainly seem fixed on your position here, we...You certainly seem fixed on your position here, weird logic (something someone creates and possesses has no ownership rights) and indefensible ethics (so anyone should be able to copy another's effort and use it with impunity).<br /><br />PS. a bride signs a contract which defines the use of the images, she can assert any term she wishes or find a photographer who will give her what she wants. That is her choice. Even if there was no copyright law, the contract would govern how she could or could not use the images. That is basic contract law.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com